Daniel Himmelstein: Meta link is broken. Also, perhaps a feature so I can delete this note once the issue is fixed.

Jesse Spaulding: Fixed. For now the plan is to wait and see how often it's requested to be able to delete a note. I don't think it's something we want happening a lot. Although, if people are free to edit their comments it makes sense that they could delete it as well.

Daniel Himmelstein: I still get a 'ERR_EMPTY_RESPONSE' error when clicking Meta. I was thinking, once these bugs are fixed, we could delete these messages, but I'm fine with the messages staying online.

Jesse Spaulding: I actually fixed a different Meta link. Now both are fixed. As trivial as this conversation is I think it's best to leave it :)

Jesse Spaulding: Thanks for the feedback. The preview of the resource may not be possible. However, we should be able to come up with a better UX for those who want to go directly to the link (most people). Will work on it..

Daniel Himmelstein:

@jspauld, the new display format and linking system for references is a big improvement. Some suggestions:

• the tooltip that appears when hovering over a references disappears when I move my mouse over it (so I cannot click links or copy text).
• the author list is overly punctuated. I prefer the sparsely punctuated format of "Wei WQ, Cronin RM, ...".
• consider journal names in italic
• consider article names in bold or underlined
• consider implementing in citation style language and sharing, so I can use the style for my RMarkdown documents.

Daniel Himmelstein: @jspauld, perhaps we should be able to associate multiple publications with a single discussion. For example, many resources have an initial publication and periodical update publications. Or a discussion could compare two resources and therefore be applicable to both.

It would also be helpful for publication pages to link out to all citing pages.

Jesse Spaulding: @dhimmel Agree with your points and will work on it.

Jesse Spaulding: @dhimmel Most of your suggestions have been implemented. Publication pages now link out to all citing pages, and I've created a separate post about that.

Daniel Himmelstein: @jspauld, I am getting a database error when I try to change the publication associated with a discussion.

Jesse Spaulding: @dhimmel should be fixed now. Please ignore the last message — I was mistakenly still logged in as you.

Jesse Spaulding: Yes, you can. If you click your profile image in the top right of the screen you will see a menu. Click 'Account'. This UI is being used by others, such as Twitter. But, I don't actually think it's that intuitive — so, may change it.

Antoine Lizee: Okay I should've dig a bit further to understand "account" and "profile" settings are different. It's not that counter-intuitive, but adding a link to the account settings in the profile editing pane and vice-versa would be nice. Or just two tabs? Thanks for the quick answer.

Jesse Spaulding: This should be fixed. Can you try again with one of the images that didn't work?

Antoine Lizee: It works now, thanks. But I need to refresh the profile page to see the modifications.

Jesse Spaulding: Good catch! Yes, they were evaluated case sensitive. This should be fixed now.

Jesse Spaulding: Will fix. We forgot to update that when we added author ordering to ThinkLab.

Jesse Spaulding: Author ordering with Crossref has now been corrected.