|
|
Views
32
Topics
Referenced by
Cite this as
Daniel Himmelstein (2017) Why we predicted ictogenic tricyclic compounds treat epilepsy?. Thinklab. doi:10.15363/thinklab.d231
License
Share
|
Scooter Morris: Care should be taken against over-interpreting the "clusters" in your visualization. In particular, if you look at the drugs listed closely, you'll see that there are actually two groups with only cyproheptadine and clozapine showing any similarity that crosses the groups. The fact that the two groups are next to each other is a simple artifact of the layout.
Daniel Himmelstein: @scootermorris great point. The 9 ictogenic tricyclic compounds can be broken into two groups based on their structures. First the tricyclic antidepressants — amitriptyline, imipramine, nortriptyline, clomipramine, and desipramine — have the three connected rings with a tail. Second there's cyproheptadine, loxapine, clozapine, and amoxapine, which all have a fourth ring that is not directly touching the tricyclic structure. These four compounds seem to have diverse therapeutic applications: cyproheptadine is a first-generation antihistamine, loxapine is a typical antipsychotic, clozapine is an atypical antipsychotic, and amoxapine is a tetracyclic antidepressant. So @scootermorris I think you're right that the small chemical differences may actual be quite meaningful.